Although the legislation is similar to the Tenant Fees Act 2019 in England, it would be a mistake to think it’s the same. The outcome is fairly similar but there are many important differences that affect calculations and procedures.
- 1 Transitional Provisions Relating to Assured Shorthold Tenancies
- 2 Tenancies Which Apply to the Fees Act
- 3 Prohibited Payments to Landlords and Letting Agents
- 4 Prohibition on Contracts for Services With Landlord or Agent
- 5 Prohibition on Requiring the Grant of a Loan
- 6 Permitted Payments
- 6.1 Lettings Work or Property Management Work Carried Out by the Agent
- 6.2 Rent
- 6.3 Security Deposit
- 6.4 Holding Deposit
- 6.4.1 Prescribed Information
- 6.4.2 Deadline for Agreement
- 6.4.3 Repayment of Holding Deposit
- 6.4.4 When the Holding Deposit Can Be Retained
- 6.5 Payment in the Event of Default
- 6.6 Payment in Respect of Council Tax
- 6.7 Payment in Respect of Provision of Utilities
- 6.8 Payment in respect of television licence
- 6.9 Payment in respect of communication service
- 7 Existing Tenancies Before 1 September 2019
- 8 Enforcement and Penalties
- 9 Further Guidance
Transitional Provisions Relating to Assured Shorthold Tenancies
The Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 has yet to be fully brought into force in Wales. This Act will literally change everything about renting in Wales from the abolition of assured shorthold tenancies to changing things like tenants notice to a landlord. It should be noted that this Act will introduce fairly similar tenancies which will be based upon existing models (although the significance of changes shouldn’t be underestimated). Instead of assured shorthold tenancies, there will be an “occupation contract” and a tenant will be known as a “contract-holder”.
Much of the Fees Act quoted in this article will refer to a “contract-holder” and a “standard occupation contract” or similar because the Fees Act has been written with the Renting Homes Act in mind. However, because the Fees Act is commencing soon, provision needs to be made for existing assured shorthold tenancies.
Under The Renting Homes (Fees etc.) (Wales) Act 2019 (Transitional Provision for Assured Shorthold Tenancies) Regulations 2019 which also commences from 1 September 2019, these provisions are made to allow for terminology to apply to AST’s in Wales.
Simply put, any reference in the Fees Act to a contract-holder or standard occupation contract is to be read as though it’s a reference to a tenant of an AST or an AST:
Parts 1 to 5 and 7 of the Act (including section 20, when read as provided for in this regulation) are to be treated as having effect in relation to assured shorthold tenancies, and for this purpose—
(a) references in the Act to a standard occupation contract are to be read as references to an assured shorthold tenancy,
(b) references in the Act to a contract-holder are to be read as references to a tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy,
(c) references in the Act to a landlord are to be read as having the same meaning as do references to a landlord in the Housing Act 1988, …
Tenancies Which Apply to the Fees Act
At the time of commencement, the Fees Act will only apply to assured shorthold tenancies. Once the Renting Homes Act commences (no date announced at the time of writing), it will also apply to “standard occupation contracts”.
Therefore, at commencement, the Fees Act does not apply to contractual tenancies (company lets, rents over £100k etc.) nor does it apply to licences (lodger agreements for example).
Prohibited Payments to Landlords and Letting Agents
From 1 September 2019, it is an offence for a landlord or agent to require a prohibited payment to be made to the landlord, agent, or any other person in consideration of the grant, renewal or continuance of a standard occupation contract (AST), or pursuant to a term which purports to require the payment to be made.
It’s important to note the scope of this wording. It’s an offence to require a prohibited payment from “any person” not just the tenant contract holder. This includes a prospective tenant, guarantor, parent, or any other person.
Just like England, the starting point for a prohibited payment is “any money” is prohibited unless it is specifically permitted within the Fees Act.
The permitted payments are:
- money payable by a landlord to a letting agent in respect of lettings work or property management work carried out by the agent on behalf of the landlord;
- security deposits;
- holding deposits;
- payments in default;
- payments in respect of council tax;
- payments in respect of utilities;
- payments in respect of a television licence;
- payments in respect of communication services.
Each of these permitted payments will be dealt with individually shortly.
Any term requiring a prohibited payment is not binding on the contract holder (tenant) but the contract continues, so far as practicable, to have effect in every other respect.
Prohibited payments would include for example (but not limited to): admin fees, referencing fees, check-in fees, inventory charges etc.
Prohibition on Contracts for Services With Landlord or Agent
In addition to prohibited payments, it’s an offence for a landlord or agent to require a person to enter into a contract for services with the landlord, agent, or any other person in consideration of the grant, renewal or continuance of a standard occupation contract (AST), or pursuant to a term of which purports to require entry into the contract for services.
There are two exceptions allowed:
- the tenancy agreement itself between landlord and tenant is a permitted contract for service.
- The management agreement between landlord and letting agent is a permitted contract for a service if the contract for services concerned is a contract between a landlord and a letting agent only, in respect of lettings work or property management work to be carried out by the agent on the landlord’s behalf.
Again, note the wording. The ban on requiring a person to enter into a service contract applies to any person. That’s why the legislation needs to permit the actual tenancy agreement and management agreement because otherwise “a person” would have even disallowed those service contracts.
Any term requiring a prohibited contract of service is not binding on the contract holder (tenant) but the contract continues, so far as practicable, to have effect in every other respect.
A prohibited service would include a referencing company for example.
Prohibition on Requiring the Grant of a Loan
Finally, it’s also an offence to require the grant of a loan in consideration of the grant, renewal or continuance of a standard occupation contract (or a term purporting such a grant).
Any term requiring a prohibited grant of a loan is not binding on the contract holder (tenant) but the contract continues, so far as practicable, to have effect in every other respect.
As explained earlier, the requiring of any money, contract for service or grant of a loan is prohibited unless expressly permitted under the Fees Act.
Here we list each of the permitted payments.
Lettings Work or Property Management Work Carried Out by the Agent
Section 4 permits a payment by a landlord to a letting agent in respect of lettings work or property management work carried out by the agent on behalf of the landlord.
This shows the extent of the ban. If the ban only applied to limited specified persons, there would be no need for this permitted payment. However, because of the wide scope and the fact that money is banned to “any person” unless permitted, it’s needed.
“Letting agent” means a person who carries out lettings work or property management work (whether or not the person carries out other work).
“Lettings work” has the same definition as contained in section 10 Housing (Wales) Act 2014.
“Property management work” has the meaning contained in section 12 Housing (Wales) Act 2014.
Thankfully rent is a permitted payment! However, like England, there are some restrictions.
… if the amount of rent payable in respect of a relevant period (“P1”) is more than the amount of rent payable in respect of another relevant period (“P2”), the additional amount payable in respect of P1 is a prohibited payment.
A “relevant period”, means any period in respect of which a payment of rent falls to be made.
Unlike England where it’s only prohibited if a later period is at a lower amount than an earlier period, for Wales, it’s any period being higher than any other period.
For example, if we have the following payments due:
1 October (P1) £700
1 November (P2) £500
The difference between the two is prohibited (£200).
In addition, the following example is also prohibited by £200:
1 October (P1) £500
1 November (P1) £700
In particular with student lets, landlord’s may charge 3 or 4 different amounts during an entire term. Because there may be differing amounts and differing periods, it gets even more complicated.
Note: this part is very complex and difficult to explain so please be patient and don’t worry if it doesn’t sink in at first read! With thanks again to David at Training for Professionals for the consult!
Where the duration of one relevant period (P1) differs from that of another (P2), the following steps are to be taken.
- Step 1 for each of P1 and P2, the applicable daily rate of rent (the “ADR”) is to be calculated (and in the case of an amount that is not a whole number of pennies, then rounded up to the nearest penny) by dividing the total amount of rent for the period by the number of days in the period.
- Step 2 if there is no difference between the ADR for each period, there is no prohibited payment.
- Step 3 but if the ADR for P1 differs from that for P2, determine which of the rates is the lower (the “lower ADR”) and which is the higher (the “higher ADR”).
- Step 4 for whichever period in respect of which the higher ADR is payable, calculate the amount of rent that would have been payable for it if rent had been payable in respect of that period at the lower ADR.
- Step 5 calculate the difference between the amount of rent calculated under Step 4, and the amount of rent actually payable in respect of the period in which the higher ADR is payable.
The resulting amount is a prohibited payment.
Let’s put this into a sample using a genuine student let example that an agent was going to put in a tenancy agreement where the rent is £408 per month and it’s an 11-month term.
- 1st September – 3 January £1496
- 4th January – 10 April £1496
- 11 April – 31 July £1496
- 1 August – 31 August (and thereafter) £408
Because the periods are not calendar months and they are for different lengths, the 5 step calculation to establish the applicable daily rate has been triggered.
Step 1 First we have to calculate the rent for each of the periods and get the ADR. We need to find the number of days in each period and divide the rent amount by those days.
1 September 2019 – 3 January 2020 = 125 days, £1496 / 125 = £11.97 ADR
4 January 2020 – 10 April 2020 = 98 days, £1496 / 98 = £15.27 ADR
11 April 2020 – 31 July 2020 = 112 days, £1496 / 112 = £13.36
1 August 2020 – 31 August 2020 = 31 days, £408 / 31 = £13.17
Step 2 This step checks if the ADR is the same for each period. We have £11.97, £15.27, £13.36 and £13.17 so they’re not the same amounts. We, therefore, must move to step 3.
Step 3 For this step, we must find the highest and lowest ADR in P1 and P2. Starting with the first two, the “lower ADR” is £11.97 and the “higher ADR” is £15.27.
Step 4 In this step we find the period for the higher ADR which is 4 January 2020 – 10 April 2020 (£15.27 ADR). Then, calculate the amount of rent that would have been payable for it if the rent had been payable in respect of that period at the lower ADR. The lower ADR is £11.97 and the number of days for the period with the higher ADR is 98. So we calculate 98 x £11.97 which equals £1173.06.
Step 5 Finally we must calculate the difference of what we just got from step 4 and the actual rent payable for the period with the higher ADR (January – April). Therefore, £1496 – £1173.06 = £322.94.
We then need to repeat this calculation for each P1 and P2 where the length of time differs (which in our case is all of them) and all the calculations look like this:
This resulting £515.23 is the prohibited payment of rent which is an offence and would prohibit the landlord from serving a section 21 notice until repaid plus attract a fine or fixed penalty (see later).
Interestingly, using the same dates in England produces only a £7.49 prohibited payment due to the different way it’s calculated.
Don’t worry too much if you didn’t follow above. Basically, where there are different lengths of periods as above, the daily rate of rent being charged must always be the same for each period. You can always ask a question (if you’re a subscriber).
Six Months Rental in Advance
Sometimes a landlord will want to take 6 months rent in advance. However, this might be prohibited under the steps shown earlier, it all depends on the number of days within a period.
As an example, let’s say the rent is £595.00 per calendar month and the landlord wants to take the following payments:
1 October 2019 – 31 March 2020, £3570 (£595 x 6)
1 April 2020 – 30 April 2020, £595 (and thereafter at £595).
Here we have different payments for different length periods (one payment is for six months and the other is for one month).
As we did earlier, first we get the ADR for P1 and P2:
P1 1 October 2019 – 31 March 2020 = 183 days, £3570 / 183 = £19.51 ADR
P2 1 April 2020 – 30 April 2020 = 30 days, £595 / 30 = £19.84 ADR
The lower ADR is P1 (£19.51) and the higher (£19.84) is in P2.
We now need to calculate the lower ADR (P1 £19.51) as if that had been charged for the period for the higher ADR (P2 30 days). £19.51 x 30 = £585.30.
£585.30 – £595.00 = £9.70 difference. This difference of £9.70 is a prohibited payment!
Calendar Monthly Amounts
What about the position of a regular calendar monthly rental (e.g. £595 per calendar month)? Surely this is caught because January has a different number of days to February?
The Fees Act allows for calendar monthly rents and provides that where it’s the same rent payable for each period AND each period is a specific number of calendar months, then each calendar month period is to be treated as having the same daily rate (ADR):
(a) rent is payable monthly in respect of P1 and P2, or P1 and P2 are both periods calculated by reference to the same number of calendar months, and
(b) the amount of rent payable in respect of P1 and P2 is the same, P1 and P2 are to be treated for the purposes of Step 2 … as having the same ADR.
This allows for calendar monthly, quarterly, two calendar monthly etc. payments without worry about the number of days in each calendar month.
It is for this reason in the earlier examples we did not need to continue our calculation because the ADR of the periodic calendar monthly payments are treated as being the same.
Comment in Relation to Different Periods and Different Amounts
Under schedule 1, it states that-
No account is to be taken of any difference between the rent payable in respect of P1 and another relevant period to the extent that it results from a permitted variation of the rent.
A permitted variation is defined as a variation made –
- by agreement between the landlord and the contract-holder
- pursuant to a term in the contract which provides for variation of the rent under the contract, or
- by or as a result of an enactment.
Could it be argued that the different amounts specified in the tenancy (using the examples above) are variations in the rent pursuant to a term in the contract which provides for variation of the rent under the contract?
We don’t believe this could apply because if it did we could put anything we like in the tenancy (for example £10,000 for the first period and then £400 per month)!
We believe the intention of the permitted variation is for a term varying the rent at some future date for example a clause linking the rent to RPI. If the rent increased as a result of RPI after 12 months, no account would be taken of that variation.
However, we will have to wait for the courts to decide on this point.
Furthermore, we would like to point out that this is new and as yet untested legislation. It seems bizarre that in the six months rent in advance example, despite charging a lower ADR rate for the six months, there still resulted a prohibited payment of £9.70. This makes no sense and clearly goes against the intention. However, we believe we’ve done the maths correctly and followed the steps correctly. We will have to wait and see how the courts calculate and interpret the legislation.
Taking a security deposit is a permitted payment. This is the familiar deposit that would need protecting in a deposit scheme.
However, the amount which can be taken must not exceed a “prescribed limit”. This prescribed limit is to be made by regulations and at the time of writing haven’t been published.
A holding deposit of a maximum of one week’s rent is a permitted payment.
Holding deposit is defined as an amount which:
- before the grant of a standard occupation contract or AST, is paid to a landlord or a letting agent;
- is paid for the purpose of reserving a right of first refusal in relation to the granting of the contract, subject to suitability checks to be carried out as to the prospective contract-holder and agreement between the parties to enter into the contract;
- does not exceed an amount equivalent to one week’s rent under the contract.
Any excess over one week’s rent is a prohibited payment. Unfortunately, there’s no legislated calculation for finding one weeks rent but the official guidance suggests dividing the calendar monthly amount by 4.35. Remember this is a “maximum” amount so you must round down for this calculation (contrary to the example calculation in the guidance).
Only one holding deposit can be taken per property (because the payer must be given the first refusal).
There is a very specific procedure for dealing with holding deposits found in schedule 2 of the Fees Act which is dealt with next.
When receiving a holding deposit from a prospective tenant, there will be some prescribed information or a prescribed form to give to the prospective tenant. At the time of writing no such information or form has been prescribed nor do we know how this must be provided to the tenant (in writing etc).
A failure to provide the prescribed information results in the holding deposit having to be returned even if there is some reason allowing a landlord or agent to retain the holding deposit (see in a moment).
Deadline for Agreement
Like England, there’s a “deadline for agreement” which is the date by which the holding deposit must have been repaid in one form or another (unless an exception applies, see in a moment).
The default date is 15 days beginning with the day on which the holding deposit is paid. But, this date can be changed by agreement “in writing” between the parties.
Repayment of Holding Deposit
The default position is that the holding deposit must be repaid.
The person who received the holding deposit must repay it if—
- the parties enter into the contract before the deadline for agreement and in this case it must be repaid within 7 days of the contract being made, or
- the parties fail to enter into the contract before the deadline for agreement and in this case, it must be repaid within 7 days of the deadline for agreement date.
In respect of repaying where a contract has been entered into “before” the deadline for agreement date, it’s acceptable for the holding deposit amount to be applied towards the first payment of rent or the security deposit.
If all or part of the holding deposit is applied towards the security deposit, the amount applied is treated as a tenancy deposit being received on the date the contract is made.
When the Holding Deposit Can Be Retained
There are a number of exceptions to repaying the holding deposit allowing the landlord or agent to retain it.
Prospective Tenant Provides False or Misleading Information
The landlord or letting agent may retain the holding deposit if the prospective tenant provides false or misleading information to the landlord or letting agent and:
- the landlord is reasonably entitled to take into account the difference between the information provided by the contract-holder and the correct information in deciding whether to grant a contract to the contract-holder, or
- the landlord is reasonably entitled to take the contract-holder’s action in providing false or misleading information into account in deciding whether to grant such a contract.
Remember as explained earlier, if the prescribed information has not been given in accordance with the regulations which are as yet to be published, even if the above is a reason to retain the holding deposit, it will nevertheless have to be repaid.
The Prospective Tenant Has Decided Not to Enter Into a Contract
If the prospective tenant notifies the landlord or letting agent “before the deadline for agreement” that they have decided not to enter into a tenancy, the landlord or agent may retain the holding deposit (but only if prescribed information is given).
Landlord or Agent Takes All Reasonable Steps to Enter Into a Contract
Where the landlord or letting agent takes all reasonable steps to enter into a contract before the deadline for agreement but, the contract-holder fails to take all reasonable steps to enter into a contract before that date, the holding deposit may be retained by the landlord.
Again, this is subject to the prescribed information being given.
Useful Forms and Templates
We have produced some useful forms and templates for subscribers to use in relation to holding deposits:
- Receipt for holding deposit
- Letter that retaining holding deposit due to false or misleading information
- Letter that retaining holding deposit due to the tenant not proceeding
- Letter Informing Not Return Holding Deposit – Reasonable Steps to Grant Tenancy
- Letter Returning Holding Deposit in Full – No Tenancy Granted
Payment in the Event of Default
Getting back to the list of permitted payments, if the tenancy contains a term requiring payment in the event of a failure by the contract-holder to make a payment due or, a payment due to a breach of a term of the contract, then this payment is permitted.
However, if the default payment relates to a failure to make a payment of rent by the due date, the amount of the payment must not exceed the “prescribed limit”. At the time of writing, the prescribed limit has not yet been published.
It’s also allowed under the Fees Act for the Welsh Government to add other defaults to the list (in addition to non-payment of rent) but again, these have not been published (if there are to be any). In England, a further limited default is if there is the loss of a key.
Payment in Respect of Council Tax
A payment that a contract-holder is required to make to a billing authority in respect of council tax is a permitted payment if the contract-holder is liable to make the payment by virtue of any of sections 6, 8 or 9 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992.
Note: the wording only allows payment to the “billing authority”. It is not allowed for the contract to make council tax payable to the landlord or agent (or anybody else).
Furthermore, the term in the contract can only allow for payment to be made if the tenant is liable under the legislation for council tax (for example, in a council tax HMO, the landlord is liable to pay the council tax so it will not be lawful to have a clause requiring the tenant to make payment).
Payment in Respect of Provision of Utilities
Payment for electricity, gas, other fuel, water, sewerage or a green deal plan is a permitted payment if it is required under the contract and it is made in respect of the dwelling subject to the contract.
Note: there is no restriction on who the payment can be made to (unlike the council tax) but, it must only consist of a payment “in respect of the dwelling subject to the contract”.
The definition of a dwelling is found in section 146 Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 which provides:
For the purposes of this Act “dwelling” means a dwelling which is wholly in Wales, and—
(a) does not include any structure or vehicle which is capable of being moved from one place to another, but
(b) includes any land occupied together with the dwelling, unless the land is agricultural land exceeding 0.809 hectares.
Payment in respect of television licence
A payment that a contract-holder is required to make to the British Broadcasting Corporation in respect of a television licence is a permitted payment if the contract-holder is required by the contract to make the payment.
Note: like council tax, this can only be payable to the BBC and not to any other person.
Payment in respect of communication service
Payment for a service enabling a telephone (other than a mobile telephone), the internet, cable television or satellite television is a permitted payment if it is required under the contract and relates to the dwelling subject to the contract.
Existing Tenancies Before 1 September 2019
The prohibited payments, service contracts or granting of a loan do not apply in respect of:
- a requirement imposed before 1 September 2019, nor
- a requirement forming part of an AST entered into before the 1 September 2019.
It will, however, apply to all new tenancies or renewals on or after 1 September 2019. It will likely apply to any statutory periodic tenancy commencing on or after 1 September 2019 (but not a contractual periodic tenancy which our agreements continue to).
Enforcement and Penalties
It’s a criminal offence to breach the Fees Act and a fine may be payable in addition to repayment of any prohibited payment.
Either the local authority or the licensing authority (Cardiff) may enforce the Fees Act.
An authorised officer may, by notice, request documents from landlords, letting agents or contract-holders in order to investigate whether a breach of the Fees Act has occurred. It’s a criminal offence to fail to provide any requested document(s).
A conviction under the Fees Act is a consideration under the “fit and proper person” test for holding a Rent Smart Wales licence.
The enforcing authority may bring proceedings in relation to an offence and a person may also make a civil claim in the county court for recovery of any prohibited payment. A civil claim may not be made if criminal proceedings have been commenced and not discontinued.
Fixed Penalty Notice
An enforcement officer may give a fixed penalty notice of £1,000 to anyone they suspect of committing an offence under the Fees Act. Payment would be an alternative to criminal proceedings.
Note: the fixed penalty is not “up to” £1,000. It’s a fixed amount of £1,000.
Section 21 Notice Restrictions
No section 21 notice (nor section 173/186 notice when the Renting Homes Act commences) may be given if the landlord has received a prohibited payment and it has not been repaid. This also applies if a holding deposit has been received which has not been repaid (unless there are circumstances to properly retain it or if it has been offset from the rent or tenancy deposit).
The Welsh Government has issued official guidance on the tenant fees ban in Wales.