To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
3 Comments
There is no implied right to withhold rent just whilst repairs are being carried out.
However, the tenant may be entitled to compensation by way of a reduction in the rent for the inconvenience and loss of value. They don’t need to show an actual financial loss.
There is no breach of repairing duties if the works are carried out with reasonable expedition. If the repairs go beyond that, the way to value the compensation is to ask “how much is the property worth in its current state?”
I think a garage with a leaking roof is going to be worth very little in its current state so the tenant may be entitled to damages reflecting a larger proportion of the rent. This very much depends on the size of the garage and size of leak etc. Compare for example a four bedroom house with a small leak in one unused bedroom, the proportion of rent would be much lower.
T doesn’t have a cast iron case and a few things to consider:
1. To use ancient common law recoupment rights of self-help and set-off T would need to follow a strict process
2. Did the defect exist before the start of the tenancy?
3. L statutory repairing obligations do not extend to detached outbuildings?
4. Even in the case of Moorjani the maximum % mentioned was 15% and since the garage is not part of the dwelling the argument for compensation equal to or higher than this would be weak
I read this question to mean it was a garage letting. Fair enough if it’s a house and only the garage part is in disrepair – then the percentage would be much lower.
In my view repairing extends beyond the dwelling where it is included in the letting – see Edwards v Kumarasamy [2015] EWCA Civ 20. It is noted that case has been given permission to be heard in the Supreme Court so the outcome could change.
Even if it’s not statutory repairing, I see no reason why it’s not a contractual repairing obligation – after all rent is being paid for it’s use. (It is also noted section 11 simply implies a repairing obligation into a tenancy so is effectively contractual too).