The deposit has been protected within 30 days, but, although not detailed as such upon the Tenancy Deposit Certificate, which shows agent details, on the DPS system the landlord is detailed as an individual when in actual fact the landlord is a limited company, albeit effectively of the individual. Is this likely to invalidate the protection and mean that the only way to use Section 21 will be to pay the deposit back first? Similarly, if not an issue, the prescribed information also details the incorrect landlord as above and is incomplete, such as failing to detail when the deposit or part can be retained. Would this invalidate that?
Deposits and Tenancy Deposit Schemes (England) | England | Start of a Tenancy (England)
Deposit Protection & Prescribed Information
View your previously asked questions. (Will only show questions from August 2020)
(Link above back to topic only works for questions added after end of August 2020)