To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
3 Comments
Tricky as it’s not entirely clear.
From what’s described, they sound like a trespasser.
The landlord (owner) could try using the trespasser procedure as that will flush out all necessary details in the court. If it’s found to be wrong, it would fail but at least then the occupier will be forced to provide necessary evidence allowing the landlord to make a normal claim if necessary.
I thought if a head T ends their tenancy blogs NTQ then the sub-t automatically becomes T of the head LL ?
That would be the case if the tenant is “lawfully” sub-letting and the occupier is an assured shorthold tenant. You mentioned the occupier forged an agreement which indicates there’s no “lawful” sub-letting.