• Login
  • Join
  • Access Problems
0 Items
GRL Landlord Association
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Subscribers
  • Forms
  • Recent
  • Contact
  • Find Answers
    • England Handbook
    • Wales Handbook
    • Admin Support
  • Ask a Question
    • View Questions
    • Your Q & A Activity
Select Page

Tenant Wins £128,000 Home Cover Case With Insurer

by guildy | 23 Feb 2016 | News, Repairing Obligations, Tenant Repairs | 0 comments

Tenant Wins £128,000 Home Cover Case With Insurer

A home insurer has lost a claim for almost £128,000 compensation after paying out for damage caused by a leaking pipe against a multi-millionaire tenant.

NFU Mutual went to the High Court after scientist Galina Govina rejected a demand from the company to pay for the damage.

She rented the £1 million thatched home in West Grafton, Wiltshire, for £2,800 a month from a landlord who had home insurance cover with the company and argued the tenancy agreement showed the landlord would insure the property against all risks for both of them.

However, the insurer argued Ms Govina, 54, was at fault because while she was away from the cottage over Christmas 2010, a water pipe froze and burst. The leak flooded the cottage leading to the insurance company picking up the £128,000 tab for the repairs.

The company claimed the insurance was taken out for the benefit of the landlord and that the pipe burst because Ms Govina breached her tenancy agreement by failing to leave the heating on low while she was away.

Ms Govina argued that she did leave the heating on, but the system malfunctioned.

The case examined the insurer’s right of subrogation – the legal process that allows an insurance company to claim compensation from a third party responsible for an insured loss.

The court rejected the insurer’s claim that they had a right of subrogation against Ms Govina.

The court agreed with her that the insurance was taken out for the benefit of her and the landlord, so the insurance company had no right to claim money from her.

The company also failed to produce any evidence to rebut Ms Govina’s statement that the heating broke down.

Speaking for Ms Govina, barrister Andrew Butler said his client was shocked to receive the bill.

“This was not an uncommon form of tenancy agreement. There hasn’t really been a case like this before in a residential context,” he said.

“If the judge found that the insurance policy didn’t apply for both the landlord and the tenant, that would certainly be a point of concern for tenants.”

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Please Login

Country

This article applies to England and Wales
Tweets by @adrian_thompson
Discounted landlords buildings insurance

Landlords Building Insurance

Guild subscribers can get discounted landlords buildings insurance especially designed for landlords

Read more ...

Tenant Referencing Service

Tenant Referencing

Tenant Referencing Service

Read more ...

Categories

Navigation

  • Home
  • Pricing
  • Subscribers
  • Forms
  • Recent
  • Contact
  • Find Answers
    • England Handbook
    • Wales Handbook
    • Admin Support
  • Ask a Question
    • View Questions
    • Your Q & A Activity

Subscribers

  • Login
  • Join
  • Access Problems

Terms

General terms and conditions

Website terms

Privacy policy

Copyright

(c) Guild of Residential Landlords

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkRead more